Serial C-reactive Protein Monitoring in Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Powerful Predictor or Potentially Pointless?

Authors/contributors
Abstract
Background Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) is an important test in the initial diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). There is no widely accepted algorithm for the resolution of PJI. Surgeons have traditionally used CRP to determine if the infection has resolved. However, this practice is not currently supported by significant data.  Methods A retrospective analysis of our departmental arthroplasty database was conducted to determine mean values of CRP pre and postoperatively for PJI treated with the debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure, single-stage revision and two-stage revision. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to determine the sensitivity and specificity of CRP testing in diagnosing persistent infection. Results Of the 121 patients who had undergone treatment (75 hip replacements and 48 knee replacements), there were 26 cases of persistent infection. There was no statistical significance in the mean CRP values between successful and unsuccessful treatment groups. The areas under ROCs (AUCs) for CRP values predicting outcomes ranged from 0.46 to 0.73. Conclusion Our study does not support the use of serial CRP monitoring as an indicator of the successful eradication of PJI.
Publication
Cureus
Date
2020-02-12
Extra
PMID: 32089975 PMCID: PMC7017925
Citation
1.
Ghani R, Hutt J, Mitchell P, Granger L, Sandiford NA. Serial C-reactive Protein Monitoring in Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Powerful Predictor or Potentially Pointless? Cureus. 2020;12(2):e6967.