Authors/contributors
- Paterson, David L.
(Author)
- Buising, Kirsty L.
(Author)
- Spelman, Tim
(Author)
- Tran-Duy, An
(Author)
- Adie, Sam
(Author)
- Boyce, Glenn
(Author)
- McDougall, Catherine
(Author)
- Molnar, Robert
(Author)
- Mulford, Jonathan
(Author)
- Rehfisch, Peter
(Author)
- Solomon, Michael
(Author)
- Crawford, Ross
(Author)
- Harris-Brown, Tiffany
(Author)
- Roney, Janine
(Author)
- Wisniewski, Jessica
(Author)
- De Steiger, Richard
(Author)
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The addition of vancomycin to beta-lactam prophylaxis in arthroplasty may reduce surgical-site infections; however, the efficacy and safety are unclear.
METHODS
In this multicenter, double-blind, superiority, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned adult patients without known methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization who were undergoing arthroplasty to receive 1.5 g of vancomycin or normal saline placebo, in addition to cefazolin prophylaxis. The primary outcome was surgical-site infection within 90 days after surgery.
RESULTS
A total of 4239 patients underwent randomization. Among 4113 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population (2233 undergoing knee arthroplasty, 1850 undergoing hip arthroplasty, and 30 undergoing shoulder arthroplasty), surgical-site infections occurred in 91 of 2044 patients (4.5%) in the vancomycin group and in 72 of 2069 patients (3.5%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 1.73; P=0.11). Among patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, surgical-site infections occurred in 63 of 1109 patients (5.7%) in the vancomyin group and in 42 of 1124 patients (3.7%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.23). Among patients undergoing hip arthroplasty, surgical-site infections occurred in 28 of 920 patients (3.0%) in the vancomyin group and in 29 of 930 patients (3.1%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.63). Adverse events occurred in 35 of 2010 patients (1.7%) in the vancomycin group and in 35 of 2030 patients (1.7%) in the placebo group, including hypersensitivity reactions in 24 of 2010 patients (1.2%) and 11 of 2030 patients (0.5%), respectively (relative risk, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.08 to 4.49), and acute kidney injury in 42 of 2010 patients (2.1%) and 74 of 2030 patients (3.6%), respectively (relative risk, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.83).
CONCLUSIONS
The addition of vancomycin to cefazolin prophylaxis was not superior to placebo for the prevention of surgical-site infections in arthroplasty among patients without known MRSA colonization. (Funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12618000642280. opens in new tab.)
Publication
New England Journal of Medicine
Notes
Key Question: Is adding vancomycin to standard cefazolin antibiotic prophylaxis superior for preventing surgical site infections in patients undergoing arthroplasty, compared to cefazolin alone?
Findings:
-
Overall, adding vancomycin did not significantly reduce surgical site infections within 90 days compared to cefazolin alone (4.5% vs 3.5%, RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.94-1.73, p=0.11)
-
In knee arthroplasty subgroup, vancomycin was associated with higher risk of surgical site infections (5.7% vs 3.7%, RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.04-2.23)
-
In hip arthroplasty, there was no difference between groups in infection rate
-
Vancomycin was associated with more hypersensitivity reactions but less acute kidney injury than placebo
Clinical Implications:
-
Routine addition of vancomycin to cefazolin antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended for patients undergoing arthroplasty who do not have MRSA colonization
-
May cause harm in knee arthroplasty patients by increasing surgical site infections
Strengths:
-
Large, multicenter, pragmatic, double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial design
-
Modified intention-to-treat analysis with excellent follow-up (98.8%)
Limitations:
-
Underpowered due to early termination during COVID-19 pandemic
-
Low prevalence of MRSA colonization in population
-
Did not report on costs or antibiotic resistance patterns
Level of Evidence: High
Rationale: Well-conducted randomized trial, but limited by early termination leading to underpowered sample size. Results may not apply to higher risk patients with MRSA colonization.
Citation
1.
Peel TN, Astbury S, Cheng AC, et al. Trial of Vancomycin and Cefazolin as Surgical Prophylaxis in Arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(16):1488-1498.